09MEDIA · CHECK ANY LINK
ONE FREE CHECK TO TRY

Every claim
in the clip, checked.

Paste a video, podcast, ad, or article. FAKTS pulls out the claims and tells you which hold up, what the research actually says, who backs them, and what is spin.

Free trial: one item per day. Drop a file (audio or video) or paste a link. Voice, on-screen text, and captions all get read.
09MEDIA · REVIEW
WHAT
HOLDS
UP?
PER-CLAIM VERDICT · SOURCES
10HOW IT WORKS
FOUR PASSES
Fetch
For a video, the caption track. For an article or podcast page, the visible text. Or you paste the transcript yourself.
Pull the claims
Every atomic factual statement is extracted. Opinion, ad copy, and filler are dropped.
Cross-examine
Each claim goes through the consilium of independent models with web grounding. Sources are pooled.
Score
A 0 to 100 integrity score, a per-claim verdict, a one-line research summary, and a note on who aligns with it.
11PRICING
FROM EUR 29 /MO
AMEDIA PLAN
Trial
Free
One link per day. Public shareable report. Full findings ledger.
BMEDIA PLAN
Creator
€29 /mo
Unlimited link checks. Private reports. Bulk paste. Downloadable report.
CMEDIA PLAN
Newsroom
On request
Team seats, monitoring on a channel or feed, and legal review.
12FAQ
THE COMMON ONES
  • What kind of links work?
    YouTube videos with captions, article and blog URLs, podcast episode pages with show notes, and product or ad landing pages. If a link is pure audio or video with no accessible transcript, paste the transcript instead.
  • Does it need captions?
    For video, yes. FAKTS reads the caption track. If a video has no captions, use the paste-transcript field. YouTube auto-captions are read the same as manual ones.
  • What if it is audio only?
    Paste the transcript. Any tool that produces a plain-text transcript will do. The review runs the same either way.
  • How accurate is it?
    Each claim goes through a panel of independent models with web-grounded searches, then a consensus is taken. The verdict comes with a confidence score, a one-line research summary, a note on who aligns with it, and the sources that were pooled.
  • What does 'emerging' mean?
    The evidence supports the claim, but the finding is not yet widely recognized or established in mainstream sources. It is a step above unverifiable, and a step below verified.
  • Can I share the report?
    Yes. Every review gets a public shareable URL. Anyone with the link sees the same findings, sources, and score.
Point it at anything with a claim.
Check a link ↘